Further Mathematics
AI prompts for senior secondary learners.
📅 36-Week WAEC Study Guide for Further Mathematics →1,253 prompts matching "Practice: Evaluating log to base 2 of 8"
Showing only prompts that state their year. 35 more in this subject don't name one, so choose All years to see them.
Differentiation practice question #2
I am in SS 3. Give me a differentiation problem where y = (2x+1)(x-3), find dy/dx using th
Subscribe to unlock allDifferentiation practice question #3
I am in SS 3. Give me a differentiation problem where y = (3x-2)/(x+1), find dy/dx using t
Subscribe to unlock allDifferentiation practice question #4
I am in SS 3. Give me a differentiation problem where y = (2x-1)^5, find dy/dx using the c
Subscribe to unlock allDifferentiation practice question #5
I am in SS 3. Give me a differentiation problem where y = sin(3x) + cos(2x), find dy/dx. L
Subscribe to unlock allIntegration practice question #4
I am in SS 3. Give me an integration problem where I must find the area under the curve y
Subscribe to unlock allWAEC past-question practice: calculus #1
I am in SS 3. Give me a WAEC Further Mathematics past-question on differentiation using th
Subscribe to unlock allWAEC past-question practice: calculus #2
I am in SS 3. Set me a WAEC-style integration question exactly the way past papers phrase
Subscribe to unlock allWAEC past-question practice: calculus #3
I am in SS 3. Give me a WAEC Further Mathematics exam-style question on finding and classi
Subscribe to unlock allQuiz me on kinematics equations of motion
I am in SS 3. Quiz me with a short kinematics word problem and check whether I selected th
Subscribe to unlock allWAEC past-question practice: mechanics #2
I am in SS 3. Set me a WAEC-style projectile motion question exactly the way past papers p
Subscribe to unlock allWAEC past-question practice: mechanics #3
I am in SS 3. Give me a WAEC Further Mathematics exam-style kinematics question involving
Subscribe to unlock allExplain-back: my understanding of Cramer's rule
I am in SS 3. Let me explain how Cramer's rule works in my own words for a 2x2 system, the
Subscribe to unlock allWorked example: prove an argument invalid using a truth table
I am in SS 3. Show me a full worked example of testing a logical argument for validity usi
Subscribe to unlock allHelp me interpret my own WAEC Further Maths past mistakes
I am in SS 3. I will describe a mistake I keep making on a particular type of Further Math
Subscribe to unlock allMultiply matrices step by step #4
Show me how to multiply A=[[4,1,-2],[0,3,1],[2,-1,5]], B=[[1,0,2],[-1,2,3],[0,1,-1]] using
Subscribe to unlock allEvaluate a 3x3 determinant by expansion #1
Give me a 3x3 matrix like A=[[1,2,3],[0,1,4],[5,6,0]] and ask me to evaluate its determina
Subscribe to unlock allEvaluate a 3x3 determinant by expansion #5
Give me a 3x3 matrix like A=[[5,-1,0],[2,3,1],[-2,0,4]] and ask me to evaluate its determi
Subscribe to unlock allSolve a 3x3 simultaneous equation system with Cramer's rule #3
Use Cramer's rule to solve the system x - 2y + z = -1, 3x + y - z = 8, 2x - y + 3z = 5. Sh
Subscribe to unlock allSolve simultaneous equations using an inverse matrix #3
Show me how to write 3x - 2y = 4 and x + y = 6 as a matrix equation, find the inverse of t
Subscribe to unlock allDefine particle and rigid body in mechanics
Ask me to explain the difference between a particle and a rigid body in mechanics, with an
Subscribe to unlock all